English Syntax Dilemma?

Question

1) The car moved quick.

2) The car moved quickly.

3) The car moved fast.

4) The car moved fastly.

5) The car moved quick across the park.

6) The car moved quickly across the park.

-------

I am confused about the sample sentences above.
Upon doing a spell-check in MS Word the software indicates the following:

(A)
Both sentences, 5 & 6, are correct.
Can this be possible?

(B)
Concerning sentences 1 & 2, ‘quick’ is improper and ‘quickly’ is proper.
Concerning sentences 3, ‘fast’ is proper.

So how is it possible that ‘’quick’ is improper and that simultaneously ‘fast’ is proper?

Furthermore, why is ‘fastly’ not even recognized as an English word while ‘quickly’ is recognized?

Answer 1

Spell-check doesn't catch grammar errors. Even the grammar check isn't perfect.



"Quick" and "Fast" are correct when used as adjectives

The car is quick.

The car is fast.



When you want to use a describing word with the verb, you have to make it into an adverb. This is _usually_ done by adding -ly or -ily.

--A fast car moves quickly.

--A quick car moves quickly.



However, "fast" is both the adverb and the adjective form (dictionary.com lists it as both). "Fastly" would be expected to be the adverb form of the word since it follows the regular rules for forming adverbs, but it seems to just be an exception--either out of widespread usage or some other reason.

--A quick car moves fast.



To summarize:

quick - adjective modifying nouns

fast - adjective modifying nouns

quickly - adverb modifying verbs

fast - also adverb modifying verbs

fastly - not a correct English word, just another quirk of the language AFAIK



And syntax concerns word-order ;-) I think this falls under morphology instead.

Answer 2

Cronin's reply is well, I simply desire so as to add slightly whatever to support you. I'm definite you're tempted by means of Visual C++, which has it is deserves. But finding out the language of C++ in that atmosphere is extra complex when you consider that you could uncover your self in a regular combat with inheritance and entry to models in aid categories. So as an alternative you want an atmosphere that permits you to study the language with out the person interface moving into the way in which. So I could suggest you to get Netbeans with the C++ choices. Do your whole courses in there developing for textual content consoles. It method you're utilising sensible IO, however the precedence to start with is the language and categories themselves. When you're able then transfer to establishing Windows person interfaces, however nonetheless in Netbeans, when you consider that you'll study to create the interfaces from scratch, that approach while you do fan the flames of Visual C++, you a lot bigger realize the way in which they've developed the preliminary mission categories and find out how to use models from the equipment lists. You are right that C# is as a rule VB in a further blouse. In truth C# within the the pcode is precisely the identical as VB in pcode. You will uncover places in C++, in particular in unmanaged code, in which you'll fairly make a holiday for pace. Such as streaming, in VB/C# you generally tend to move and any paintings is completed at the knowledge after the streaming has completed. In C++ you may have a lot bigger realtime intervals so you'll paintings at the fly with such matters. A sensible instance, I move in youtube movies, I desire a few thumbnails of a few frames so in my selfmade participant I can see a few snap shots that strike a cord in me what's at the video. With C++ I can create the thumbnails at the fly. No secondary processing wanted after the dossier has downloaded. I am very skilled in C# so I recognise that paintings of that variety is out of the query.

Answer 3

Quick is only an adjective, the adverb form is quickly.

Fast is both an adjective and an adverb.



(They are both also nouns, but mean completely different things.)



I think MS is wrong to accept 5.

Answer 4

This is not the place to do homework, especially if it has nothing to do with religion.